Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Programs Band topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Andrew High students, parents urge EPISD board for transparency after band director’s absence
Summary
Students and families from Andrew High School told the El Paso ISD board the band program has been without its director since September 2025 and asked for an independent review, a stabilization plan and clearer communication about whether the director’s resignation could be withdrawn.
Andrew High School students and parents pressed the El Paso Independent School District Board of Trustees on April 21 for clarity and immediate action after the band program operated without its longtime director since September 2025.
Student speakers described the program as a vital source of belonging and opportunity. “For some students, band is more than a class. It is a second home,” said student Dalia Nava, who told trustees the director’s absence changed morale and access to opportunities such as region and solo ensemble competitions. Several students said the uncertainty has sapped focus and momentum.
Parents and booster leaders echoed those concerns. Jose Ria, a band booster parent, said he saw “structure, discipline and pride” under the director’s leadership and that families had received little communication after the director stopped appearing at rehearsals. Denise Diaz, speaking on behalf of concerned families, asked the board for three things: an independent review of how the matter was handled, a plan to stabilize the band program, and clarification about whether a resignation could be reconsidered.
Other parents described the broader consequences of ongoing silence. “When trust is not protected, our community begins to question everything,” said Melissa Nava, who said rumors filled the gap left by scarce district communications. Advocates urged a clear timeline so students and families can plan for summer marching and audition cycles.
Board members did not take a formal action on the personnel matter during the meeting. Trustees heard the public comments during the public‑forum portion of the agenda and later moved on to consent items and other reports. The appeals in the forum asked the district to prioritize student stability and to explain the process that produced the director’s resignation without disclosing confidential personnel details.
Next steps: Families asked trustees for a public timeline and for the board to consider an independent review of procedures and communications. The board heard the requests during the meeting but did not announce a decision on those specific demands at the session’s close.
