Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regulatory Process Gravel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves amendment changing how comprehensive-plan consistency applies to gravel extraction review; 5-2 vote
Summary
The Planning Commission voted 5-2 on April 20 to amend Resolution 26-04 to recommend approval of an ordinance that removes a comprehensive-plan consistency standard from the conditional-use process for earth material extraction; supporters said the change aligns code with state statute, opponents warned it could diminish public input.
The Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning Commission voted 5-2 on April 20 to amend Planning Commission Resolution 26-04, reversing prior language and recommending approval of an assembly ordinance that would remove a specific comprehensive-plan consistency standard from the conditional-use permit (CUP) process for earth material (gravel) extraction.
Commissioner Collins, who moved the amendment, said he had reviewed the history and state law and concluded that comprehensive plans are guiding policy documents and should not operate as de facto regulation. "If we don't correct this now then I feel like this is now the comprehensive plans now in this particular gravel code is now acting as regulation as opposed to a guiding principle," Collins said, arguing the current language could invite litigation by effectively converting plan guidance into a regulatory blockade.
Commissioner Carpenter and other supporters said Collins accurately described the statutory framework and that the amendment clarifies the council's role in implementing statewide guidance rather than eliminating community input. "The statute calls it a compilation of policy statements, goals, and standards for guiding the physical, social, and economic development," Carpenter said, adding that the borough uses land-use ordinances to implement comprehensive plans.
Opponents said the amendment felt like a reversal of the commission’s previous action and risked diminishing the community's voice in decisions about gravel pits. One commissioner said the change went beyond a grammatical cleanup and could be seen as a 180-degree reversal of prior action; another commissioner noted that public participants who had attended the earlier meeting might not have expected the commission to reopen the matter.
After discussion, the commission voted to pass the amendment to Resolution 26-04 as read into the record. The vote was recorded as follows: Commissioners Collins, McCabe, Scoggin, Fonoff and Carpenter in favor; Commissioners Glenn and Allen opposed. The amendment strikes language in several 'whereas' paragraphs and replaces the resolution's recommendation to the assembly with a recommendation to approve Assembly Ordinance 26-021.
Supporters and the borough attorney noted that other borough code provisions governing CUPs for gravel pits remain — including criteria requiring preservation of the value, spirit and integrity of surrounding areas and protection of public health, safety and welfare — and that those standards continue to provide community protections even if the comprehensive-plan consistency language is changed.
The amendment will be included in the commission’s recommendation to the assembly; the assembly will consider ordinance 26-021 in subsequent proceedings.
