Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinance 26 02 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norristown council pauses window‑signage overhaul after business concerns
Summary
Council continued public hearings on a proposed window-signage amendment (Ordinance 26-02) after business owners raised concerns about a proposed five‑foot merchandise setback, cultural impacts and inadequate outreach; council voted to table final action until May 20 to allow more community input.
Norristown Municipal Council on April 21 voted to table the adoption of Ordinance 26-02 — a proposed amendment to window‑signage and display rules — after extensive public comment from small-business owners and community representatives.
What was proposed: Planning staff explained the ordinance would codify the existing 25% window‑coverage limit, tighten enforcement, and add a new requirement pushing merchandise five feet back from windows to preserve visibility for public safety and emergency response. The proposal was presented after planning staff reported police concerns that fully obstructed windows can create safety risks for officers and customers.
Public reaction: Dozens of business owners and community representatives spoke during the hearing. Several said they had not received adequate notice, noted language-access issues in outreach to a largely Latino business corridor, and argued a five‑foot setback would be infeasible in many small stores and would harm window-based merchandising and cultural displays. Denise, speaking for the Norristown Latino Business Coalition, urged more translated outreach and a town-hall with business owners before any adoption.
Council action and rationale: Council members expressed particular concern about the proposed five‑foot setback as a new restriction and urged additional targeted outreach and education. A motion to continue the public hearing and table adoption to the May 20 council meeting passed on roll call. Several council members asked staff to return with clearer public‑education materials and to explore smaller setbacks or conditional accommodations for narrow storefronts.
Quote: "We're not asking for something excessive, just a reasonable step to protect our neighborhood," Caitlyn Falco said while urging a speed bump earlier; on signage, business coalition representative Denise said the community needed more education and outreach before enforcement begins.
What’s next: The public hearing will be continued at the May 20 meeting; staff were asked to conduct targeted outreach, provide translation and educational materials, and return with refined proposals or alternative setback distances for council consideration.
