Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Udot Bypass topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
UDOT names preferred Heber Valley bypass route; local open-space committee raises access, wetlands and funding concerns
Summary
After UDOT named a preferred bypass alternative for Heber Valley, Midway’s open‑space committee spent much of its Jan. meeting parsing the plan’s three access points, wetlands mitigation and a timeline stretched through 2031, urging residents to review UDOT’s maps and submit comments by the EIS deadline.
UDOT’s recent announcement identifying a preferred bypass alternative for the Heber Valley drew sustained attention from Midway’s open‑space committee at its Jan. 7 meeting, where members raised questions about access points, wetlands impacts and long funding timelines.
The committee’s discussion began after the chair told members that UDOT has posted a narrated 30‑minute presentation, detailed maps and supporting data online and that two public open houses are scheduled this month. A staff member summarized the pre‑announcement briefing and said UDOT officials “represented that there will only be three points of access, and they said they don’t plan to move off of that,” a detail members said could affect local traffic patterns and development pressure.
Committee members flagged wetlands mitigation as another major concern. According to the briefing summarized at the meeting, UDOT expects to perform wetland mitigation and “they said they’re prepared for that” but members noted reported mitigation ratios could be greater than 1:1 (the transcript records mentions of 2:1 or 3:1). The same summary included a roughly $6.76 billion cost estimate and attendees were told funding is committed only through 2031, which one member said makes near‑term construction unlikely without a reprioritization of funds.
Members debated whether the bypass will relieve the local Main Street congestion that residents see in the summer. One committee participant said the bypass is primarily intended to move longer‑distance traffic — "based on their traffic counts, most of the traffic is going from Park City over to the Provo area" — and other members countered that local accesses (including a planned signal on SR‑113) and tourist traffic may not be solved by the proposed alignment.
Freight and rail plans were also raised. Several members noted new rail routing proposals might shift much truck traffic away from local roads, and asked UDOT to reconcile those projections with their traffic models. The committee also discussed the possibility of legal challenges; one participant said some longstanding opponents are considering retaining outside counsel.
The committee did not take a formal position at the meeting but urged residents to review UDOT’s materials and submit comments during the EIS comment period. The staff member said the EIS comment period is open through early March and that UDOT must respond to comments, though the agency is not required to change the plan.
Next steps: committee members encouraged a public review of the UDOT online materials and said the group will revisit the issue as new information or formal proposals emerge.
