Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge city to keep Gustoson Park, present petition at public forum
Summary
Multiple neighborhood residents told the Brainerd City Council they oppose proposed development of Gustoson Park, describing frequent family use and presenting a petition of 120 signatures; the city attorney warned volunteer mowing would raise liability concerns unless addressed with waivers or other protections.
Dozens of residents urged the Brainerd City Council to preserve Gustoson Park during the meeting’s public forum, presenting petitions and first-hand accounts of regular use.
Logan Klush, 824 N Street NE, said he started a petition opposing development of Gustoson Park that had 120 signatures as of Jan. 19; he said about 64% of signatories live within roughly 15 minutes of the park and argued the city should prioritize neighborhood green space over adding a small number of houses and tax revenue. "By developing this park, what are we really gaining?" Klush asked, urging council members to consider the park’s value to future generations.
Susan Bolio, 1324 8th Avenue NE, described family use of the park — soccer, frisbee and other gatherings — and said there are few remaining green spaces where neighbors can convene. Children who spoke, including Asher Campben and Lydia Campin, told councilors they wanted to keep the park "so that you can keep using it" and pleaded, "Please don't take my park."
After public comments, a council member asked whether volunteers could mow the property. City attorney Langel said the city can direct the public not to maintain city property and noted liability concerns for non‑employees (no workers’ compensation or other city coverage). He added that the council could explore waivers or other arrangements if it wanted to permit volunteer work.
The public forum closed at 7:38 p.m. The speakers’ testimony did not result in any immediate council action; the comments were placed on the record for council consideration.
