Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City finance team praised after bond sale; council set to consider multiple contracts
Summary
A financial adviser told council the city sold two bond issues at a 4.42% rate and retained a triple-A rating; staff also previewed several contracts and purchases on the full council agenda, including drainage-engineering contracts totaling over $1 million and multiple smaller procurement items.
Get email alerts on the Public Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A representative from the Frazier Lanier Company briefed council on two bond issues sold for the city and staff previewed several procurement and contract items slated for the full council agenda.
John Mazey said the bonds were sold April 7–8 and the city achieved a 4.42% rate on the sale, about 30 basis points better than earlier estimates. "We sold at 4.42. So that's a 30 basis point differential," Mazey said, and noted the city retained a triple-A rating and secured favorable market terms and fees compared with other issuers. He credited the city's accounting and finance team for the outcome.
In the agenda review, Scott listed multiple contract and purchase items that staff will present to full council, including: an amendment to Paragon Technologies' professional services contract (amended compensation $187,000); a professional engineering contract with TTL for phase two of the Cypress Creek drainage improvements project ($863,250); a professional engineering contract with Hazen and Sawyer PC for the Ridge Road and 31st Street drainage project ($199,442.25); an amendment to the minor public-works contract with Tusco Inc. for FY25 fencing services ($38,440); a minor public works contract with Chip Griffith Construction ($25,900); a contract with RCS Waterproofing LLC ($7,659); a purchase from Trailer Store Plus LLC ($11,400) for a 19-ft tilt trailer; and equipment/supplies for the Tuscaloosa Tennis Center ($13,200).
Most items were presented as previously reviewed in committee; the pre-council transcript records staff presentations and dollar figures but does not record final council votes on these contract authorizations.

