Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Evictions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents tell Santa Ana council Kingsley Management forced out mobile‑home tenants; city staff cite legal limits and state remedies
Summary
Several residents and advocacy groups described alleged intimidation, fraud and wrongful evictions at Kingsley‑managed mobile home parks and asked the council for action; city attorneys said many enforcement options fall to the state Department of Housing and courts but pledged written guidance and to coordinate referrals.
Dozens of residents and advocates urged the Santa Ana City Council to investigate evictions and alleged misconduct by a private owner and manager of mobile‑home parks during the meeting’s public‑comment period.
Speakers said that homeowners had been coerced or misled, that properties and titles were taken improperly, and that many families have exhausted local and county remedies. Several residents called for the city to formally refer cases to the state Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and to federal investigators when criminal conduct is alleged.
City Attorney Carvalho and staff responded that local government authority is constrained by state law governing mobile‑home residency and ownership. Carvalho explained the state’s HCD framework, noted that many remedies for title and sale disputes are adjudicated in state courts or through state administrative channels, and said the city is coordinating with county, state and legislative offices to identify next steps. Staff said they would produce a written summary of options for residents, collect attorney contact information, and work with supervisory offices to clarify what the city can and cannot do.
Public commenters included multiple residents who said the same management company (identified in comments as Kingsley) engaged in patterns of harassment and wrongful sales and urged the council to take overt action; one commenter urged escalation to the Department of Justice or the FBI. City staff said they had already contacted assembly and senate offices and would provide residents with guidance on what complaints to file and what documentation to collect.
Councilmembers acknowledged the residents’ distress and directed staff to prepare a written, public summary of the legal steps, available referrals and outreach actions the city has taken to date. Members explicitly noted that many individual legal remedies depend on court orders and state administrative actions, and that the city’s ability to reverse court‑issued final sales is limited.
Council did not adopt an ordinance or impose emergency remedies at the meeting; instead it asked staff to return with documentation that residents can use in state and federal complaints and to identify avenues for further city assistance where legally permissible.
