Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Veggie Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee considers Veggie program cap changes and rural grant reimbursements in S327
Summary
Committee staff proposed removing the Veggie program sunset while lowering the annual awards cap from $10 million to $5 million with a $5 million supplemental available to the Joint Fiscal Committee; staff data showed final approvals in most years have been below statutory caps.
Get email alerts on the Veggie Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Ways & Means Committee reviewed proposed amendments to S327 affecting the Veggie program and a rural industry grant reimbursement mechanism. Staff said the amendment would align Veggie’s sunset with the House Commerce recommendation (repeal the sunset) while reducing the statutory annual cap from $10 million to $5 million and allowing up to an additional $5 million by Joint Fiscal Committee approval.
A staff presentation of five-year program data showed final approvals historically have been under the $10 million statutory cap; staff said only a few past years would have required supplemental approval if the cap had been $5 million. "Their final approval amounts in many years would not hit the $5 million amount," the staff presenter (Pat) said while walking through the annual-report figures.
Committee members discussed whether reducing the cap would limit access in peak years, how initial approvals differ from final awards, and how reimbursement timing is handled for existing grants. The amendment also clarifies that for prior awards moved out of statute, grantees whose awards have not been fully reimbursed can receive a higher reimbursement rate (example given: 50% reimbursement on submitted expenses for award balances) though total award amounts will not increase.
Why it matters: the Veggie program provides capital awards for projects in sectors the bill aims to support; changing the cap and removing a sunset shifts the program’s long-term budgeting parameters. Staff told the committee the change is designed to preserve program availability while lowering the annual statutory cap and keeping a mechanism for supplemental funding in higher-need years.
Next steps: committee staff circulated draft amendment language and said the committee would vote on S327 the next morning; members asked staff to finalize amendment text and supporting data.

