Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Neighborhood Parking And Environment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Redmond council on Marymore two‑hour parking, PFAS in wells and youth services
Summary
Multiple speakers raised local issues in public comment: strong opposition to a new two‑hour limit in the Marymore neighborhood, questions about PFAS detections in supply wells, and repeated demands for more youth‑centered engagement on the Old Firehouse process.
At the start of the Redmond City Council meeting, a lengthy public‑comment period produced repeated appeals on three recurring themes: (1) opposition to a new two‑hour parking limit in the Marymore neighborhood, (2) technical questions about PFAS detections in Redmond supply wells, and (3) continued calls for a more inclusive process around the Old Firehouse teen center.
Ruth Kino spoke on behalf of residents in the Marymore area and identified four apartment complexes she said rely on street parking. "This decision has caused significant distress to both myself and my fellow community members," Kino said, and urged the council to reconsider the uniform two‑hour limit or pursue residential permits and overflow options. Emilyn Berg and Harris Chanderey echoed concerns that the change, applied across blocks, will disproportionately impact tenants who rely on on‑street parking for daily errands and work.
On environmental questions, David Morton asked a string of technical questions about recent PFAS (PFOS/PFBS) detections in several wells, requesting information about source identification, prior testing near known industrial sites, communications with the Department of Ecology, and interim public‑health protections. Morton also praised the city’s 2025 Environmental Sustainability Action Plan and urged full funding for tree‑canopy and climate resilience work.
Council members and staff responded in part during ombuds/announcements: Council member Parcy said staff will follow up about tree impacts related to the Old Firehouse site and that staff would engage with Marymore residents to better understand parking impacts. Several council members encouraged residents to use the city’s online channels for longer technical discussions and noted staff would provide follow‑up where the issues require research or coordination with county and state agencies.
Next steps: Staff committed to follow up with community engagement in Marymore to explore alternatives (residential permits, overflow options, targeted two‑hour blocks) and to return information on PFAS monitoring and any interim protections. Council members asked staff to keep residents informed of schedule and technical findings.
