Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lafayette City approves $631,400 contract package and notice to proceed for Glick Wells 6 and 7

Lafayette City Council · April 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lafayette City council approved a $295,000 amendment to a Whistler Engineering contract — bringing that contract to $631,400 — and authorized a construction agreement and notice to proceed with Reynolds Construction to add two groundwater wells to the Glick Well Field.

Lafayette City council on a unanimous voice vote approved amendments and contracts to advance the Glick Wells 6 and 7 project, which will add two groundwater wells to the city's Glick Well Field.

Andrew Moore, Chief of Operations for Lafayette Water Works, told the council that "amendment number one will add $295,000 to the contract for construction administration and resident project representative services," bringing the Whistler Engineering contract to a total of $631,400. Moore recommended the council approve the amendment, and the council voted to do so.

Moore also presented the construction agreement and associated contract documents with Reynolds Construction for the Glick Wells 6 and 7 project, noting the new wells are intended to provide redundancy when existing wells are taken out of service for maintenance or repair. The council approved the construction agreement and then approved a notice to proceed for Reynolds Construction, all by voice vote.

The actions taken at the meeting authorize Water Works to proceed with construction administration services, construction under the Reynolds contract, and the contractor's mobilization steps spelled out in the notice to proceed. Specific contract-monitoring responsibilities were described as construction administration and resident project representative services; no timeline or final completion date was specified in the transcript.

The chair closed the discussion with the approvals recorded by voice; the transcript records the approvals as unanimous voice votes but does not provide individual vote tallies.