Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Professional Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair seeks to advance H.588 on professional regulation; counsel to prepare revisions
Summary
The Senate Committee on Government Operations on April 23 agreed to have legal counsel revise H.588, an act concerning professions and occupations regulated by the Office of Professional Regulation, and return with a final draft for a vote. No formal committee vote was recorded at the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Professional Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Committee on Government Operations on April 23 agreed to move H.588 forward pending minor edits by legal counsel.
The committee chair said the bill, "an act relating to professions and occupations regulated by the Office of Professional Regulation," includes two suggested provision changes and asked counsel Tim Devlin to make those edits and return with a final draft so the committee could "have a final draft approved and vote the bill out." The chair asked, "Is everybody okay with that?" to which attendees responded affirmatively.
The exchange made clear the committee planned revisions rather than recording a formal roll-call vote. Committee discussion outside that procedural request focused on scheduling and the broader legislative review of reporting requirements; no additional amendments or objections to H.588 were recorded in the available segments.
No formal motion text, mover/second names, or roll-call tally were entered into the record during these segments; the chair’s request and assent from the committee served to authorize counsel to revise the bill and return it for formal action. The committee recessed briefly to allow Tim Devlin to prepare the revised draft and said it would reconvene to consider a final approval and vote.
The Office of Professional Regulation, which the bill would affect, was described in the meeting only as the regulatory body for the professions and occupations covered by H.588; the transcript did not specify the two suggested changes, a vote date, or additional stakeholders. Those details remain not specified and will be determinative when the committee reconvenes to consider the revised draft.

