Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves president’s committee appointments after heated exchange; vote 5–2
Summary
President Maloney presented a slate of committee and commission appointments that drew criticism from public commenters and some trustees; the board voted 5–2 to approve the appointments after extended discussion about perceived favoritism and appropriate committee representation.
President Mark Maloney presented his recommended appointments to committees and commissions, prompting an extended discussion about perceived favoritism and the public’s concerns raised during recent elections. Public commenter Jim Pinsel had urged the board to reconsider appointments he called examples of a "good old boys" practice. Several trustees responded that appointments aim to balance experience, continuity and open seats while welcoming new voices.
Trustees debated whether trustees with law-enforcement experience should sit on oversight bodies such as Mountain Bay Metro. Trustee Brent Olsen and others argued experience-based placement would strengthen oversight; other trustees cited perceptions of conflict and public sensitivity. President Maloney said the slate is a recommendation and the board’s vote is final.
A roll-call vote to approve the presented appointments passed 5–2 (Beck, Clark, Hermal, Zagami and one other voted yes; Lopez and Olsen voted no). After the vote trustees directed staff to post committee openings widely and encouraged more candidates to apply for vacancies.
Next steps: staff will publish committee openings and work with trustees to adjust assignments where members request changes; the president said he will work with trustees who asked to be reassigned.
