Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lexington planning commission reviews comprehensive plan draft, sets May public input and tentative June hearing
Summary
City staff presented a near-final draft of Lexington’s comprehensive plan update, noting data corrections and a proposed extension of the planning horizon; commissioners scheduled a public input session for May 14 and tentatively set a June 11 public hearing pending external review.
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lexington Planning Commission on April 23 reviewed a near-final draft of the city’s comprehensive plan update and agreed to hold a public input session on May 14, with a tentative public hearing on June 11 if outside review is complete.
Staff presenter Jeremy Brute said the draft combines updated versions of previously reviewed chapters and new material for the introduction, planning framework and implementation sections. “I’ll keep this relatively quick,” Brute said, then walked commissioners through corrected infographics, revised implementation tables and the restored economy chapter that was missing from an earlier package. He told the commission the percentage of residents with a bachelor’s degree shown in the draft had been updated to 57.3%.
Commissioners discussed the plan’s 20-year planning horizon and whether the update should show 2045 or 2046. Staff explained the document uses a 20-year horizon and that changing the footer throughout the document would be straightforward; the commission agreed to set the horizon at 2046 to align the next review cycle.
The commission also asked staff to add Mountain View Terrace to the subsidized-housing inventory after a commissioner said that HUD-subsidized property should be explicitly mentioned alongside tax-credit properties already listed. Staff agreed to check and insert the property name where appropriate.
Staff said the transportation chapter must be sent to VOTE for its approval and that VOTE would likely add cost estimates for transportation projects; commissioners noted a VOTE approval letter is typically included with the adoption package submitted to city council. The commission decided to treat May 14 as a combined public input session during the regular meeting and to advertise a formal public hearing for June 11 if the final edits and VOTE review are completed in time.
The next steps are for staff to deliver a repackaged final draft in the coming weeks, incorporate any commission edits at the May 14 meeting, obtain the external review letter from VOTE, and then formally advertise the June public hearing.

