Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Porch Repairs Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Geneva commission approves fiberglass column alternative for 415 Payton after debate over cost and historic value
Summary
After extended debate about repair versus replacement and the cost difference between wood and fiberglass, the Geneva Historic Preservation Commission approved a permit letting 415 Payton Street replace porch columns with fiberglass that replicates the current design; commissioners asked applicants to provide detailed cost and repair options for the record.
The Geneva Historic Preservation Commission on Tuesday approved a permit allowing the porch at 415 Payton Street to be rebuilt using fiberglass columns that replicate the appearance and presence of the existing posts.
The decision followed a lengthy exchange over whether the commission should require in‑kind wood replacement, and how to treat columns that commissioners said are likely ‘‘builder’s grade’’ and have been replaced multiple times. Commissioners said they generally prefer repair or like‑for‑like replacement but will permit substitute materials where documentation shows repair is not feasible or the cost difference is substantial.
Homeowner Kevin Berg and contractor Tom Wetmore told the commission the existing railings and columns are in poor condition and said a fiberglass alternative would offer longer‑term durability. Wetmore said the move to fiberglass was primarily a sustainability and maintenance decision. ‘‘We’re going to the fiberglass just for long‑term sustainability,’’ Wetmore said during the meeting.
Contractors and applicants also pressed for realism about materials and costs: Patrick McCann, who described himself as an experienced contractor, said he was open to substitute materials ‘‘if it looks closer to what’s there now,’’ and pointed commissioners to composite column profiles that include recessed panels.
Several commissioners said the visual detail matters more than the substrate. ‘‘Alternate material is perfectly fine here, but we would want to replicate some of those details,’’ one commissioner said, referencing recessed panels and molding that carry the porch’s character. Commissioners asked applicants to provide an itemized cost estimate comparing repair, an in‑kind wood replacement, and composite or fiberglass alternatives before future approvals.
The commission voted on the permit by roll call. Zelmer, Jensen, McManis, Solomon and Ruby voted in favor; Tobler and Phillips opposed the motion. The commission’s packet included a cost differential listed in the staff materials as "10,82167" (transcript text). Commissioners asked staff and applicants to clarify and document the cost details in a formal proposal to be returned to the commission if needed.
The American Legion, which previously sought guidance for a similar porch repair at its post on a different agenda item, attended the meeting to hear the commission’s preferences. The Legion representatives described chronic water intrusion and scupper/drainage issues that have routed water through porch columns; staff and members advised moving scuppers to the porch face and documenting drainage fixes as part of any rebuild.
No change in porch height or header dimensions was proposed. Commission staff said the commission’s period of significance was updated at the most recent survey adoption and now ends in 1986, a factor they said influenced whether certain features are treated as historic. The commission emphasized it will continue to assess such applications case‑by‑case, weighing material durability, visual replication and documented costs.
Applicants were told to return with a formal, itemized proposal that documents repair attempts, like‑for‑like cost estimates, and alternative materials and detailing. The commission capped its action on 415 Payton to the design and documentation presented and requested clearer cost breakdowns for the public record.
