Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Flood Mapping topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Polk County officials say new FEMA flood maps remain pending, leaving insurance and financing uncertainty

Polk County Board of Commissioners · April 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff said FEMA's 2014 flood maps were not adoptable and new maps are on a queue awaiting federal funding; commissioners heard that updated mapping could change floodplain boundaries and affect mortgage insurance obligations for many Polk County properties.

Commissioners discussed the county's efforts to update FEMA flood maps after staff described the 2014 maps as unreliable and unusable for local adoption. County staff reported completing the FEMA 'discovery' step last December but said the project awaits federal funding to proceed with lidar and new map development.

"We did a discovery which is FEMA's starting point to get us new maps last December," staff said, and added that the county is on FEMA's list but cannot adopt the 2014 maps because they failed required checks. County officials described uneven effects of earlier mapping — some areas could see floodplain reductions while others could rise depending on local changes and past projects such as flood walls.

Commissioners noted the practical consequences for property owners, including mortgage‑linked flood insurance requirements and the use of contract‑for‑deed or private financing as alternatives where bank financing triggers insurance. County staff offered to show residents how the draft maps affect specific properties via the county GIS and said they will proceed once FEMA provides funding to complete lidar and modeling.

The board requested staff continue to press for federal action and keep the public informed. No vote or ordinance action was tied to the discussion; it was presented as informational and part of the broader planning and floodplain ordinance conversation.