Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Jail Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews grand-jury response on jail escape; sheriff cites $500,000 in hardening and $4.5M annual staff costs
Summary
Supervisors pressed the Sheriff's Department on the grand jury's findings after a high-profile jail escape; the sheriff reported roughly $500,000 spent on immediate 'hardening' and about $4.5 million a year for additional staffing, said inspections of plumbing tunnels were inconsistent, and disciplinary actions but no terminations were taken.
The board spent substantial time on July 11 reviewing a proposed response to a Grand Jury report about a 2016 jail escape and hearing Sheriff's Department testimony about corrective measures and costs.
Brian Wade of the Sheriff's Department told the board the department had spent "around $500,000" on immediate hardening measures and that additional staffing increases cost "probably in the ballpark of $4,500,000 a year" on an annualized basis. Commander Briggs, identified as the commander of custody operations, confirmed that required inspections of plumbing tunnels and a formal tool inventory had not been completed consistently before the escape and that it likely would have been detected sooner had procedures been followed.
Supervisor Spitzer pressed for accountability, asking when the board was told that human error — not only building flaws — had caused the breach. Commander Briggs said some disciplinary actions ("4 or 5") had been concluded but there had been no demotions or terminations. Wade and Briggs acknowledged that prior briefings had occurred and that some longer-term infrastructure items remain to be implemented.
Why it matters: Supervisors noted the escape involved dangerous inmates and that the department's admission of supervisory lapses suggested a management failure that contributed to the incident. The board asked how the $500,000 and ongoing staff costs were determined and whether the investments were made before the department had fully assessed whether the problem was managerial or structural.
Outcome: The board accepted the proposed response and supporting materials; the discussion highlighted outstanding questions about tool control, inspection cadence, the nature of disciplinary actions and how the department will sustain procedural reforms.
Quotes: "We spent around $500,000 for various components," Brian Wade said. On staffing, he added the annualized cost was "probably in the ballpark of $4,500,000 a year." Commander Briggs said inspections "were not being done regularly" prior to the escape.
