Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities Bond topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Torrance poll shows path to pass $388 million school bond but consultants urge lower tax rate and outreach

Torrance Unified School District Board of Education · April 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Consultants told the Torrance Unified School District board that a statistically reliable poll showed 65% initial support for a $388 million facilities bond; support is price-sensitive and rises when the tax is framed as a concrete annual cost for homeowners, the consultants said.

Consultants advising Torrance Unified told the school board that preliminary polling shows a feasible path for a $388 million facilities bond — if the district refines the tax rate and mounts an effective outreach campaign.

Charles Heath of Team Civics and Dr. Tim McLarney of True North Research presented results from a statistically reliable survey of 1,419 likely November voters. Dr. McLarney said the sample gives a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

The initial, 75‑word ballot test produced 65% support and 24% opposition. However, Dr. McLarney warned the board that responses are tax-rate sensitive: when respondents were simply asked whether they would back a tax of $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, support dropped to about 50%. When the consultants converted that same rate into a typical homeowner cost — $189 per year for the median property in the district — support rose to about 62%.

"We can be confident this snapshot gives you a strong starting point, but tax-rate framing matters," Dr. McLarney said in presenting the methodology and results. He told the board that translating the rate into a concrete annual dollar amount for homeowners produced significantly higher favorable responses than the abstract $/100,000 formulation.

Survey respondents ranked repairs to aging infrastructure at the top of spending priorities: roof, plumbing and electrical repairs; replacing or repairing 25‑year‑old HVAC and ventilation units; bringing older facilities up to current health and ADA code; and removing hazardous materials. Instructional-technology and career-technical-education projects were also popular but trailed basic safety and repair work.

Mr. Heath said the polling pattern — strong "natural" support that remains above the 55% Prop 39 threshold through simulations of organized opposition — is the profile consultants look for when recommending a bond move forward. "We want to carefully assess their opinions and their priorities," he said, adding that the district should begin factual, educational outreach about facility needs (which the district may do) and plan for an independent, volunteer-led campaign to advocate for the measure (which by law cannot use public funds).

The consultants noted a separate, much larger scenario tested in the survey: installing HVAC in all classrooms plus solar at an estimated $510 million, which would cost a typical homeowner roughly $404 per year; that scenario polled well below the 55% threshold and would be substantially harder to pass.

No decision was made. The consultants reminded trustees the practical deadline to file for the November ballot is Aug. 7; they recommended continuing public education about facility needs, considering a lower tax rate than the $30/100,000 example, and assembling an independent campaign structure if the board opts to place a measure before voters.

Provenance: topicintro SEG 770, topfinish SEG 1669.