Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wage Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee delays decision on tip‑pooling bill; asks Department of Labor to draft guardrails
Summary
Lawmakers heard extensive testimony about tip pooling, service charges, credit‑card fees, and whether incorporating federal FLSA rules would preempt state enforcement. The committee deferred final action on SB 416 and asked the Department of Labor to draft precise statutory language and potential carve‑outs before a May 5 executive session.
The House Labor Committee opened a lengthy debate on SB 416, a bill proposing to align New Hampshire law on tip pooling and sharing with the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, then decided to postpone final action and ask the Department of Labor to draft guardrails.
DOL overview: Danielle Albert, Deputy Commissioner, explained the difference between service charges (which, if properly labeled, are treated as employer property) and tips/gratuities (which are the property of employees). Albert told the committee that the bill as drafted could effectively preempt the state's enforcement role and direct complaints to U.S. Department of Labor: "As drafted, we understand it to mean it is the FLSA that controls ... and we would be more likely than not referring it over to US DOL," she said.
Industry and worker testimony: Committee members heard contrasting testimony. Casino workers described reliance on pooled tips for night shifts; restaurant and event operators described complex team models and tax/administrative consequences when mandatory service charges are labeled incorrectly. Mike Summers of the New Hampshire Lodging and Restaurant Association explained how mandatory service charges are commonly distributed in large events and warned of IRS tax consequences if businesses mislabel charges.
Key technical concerns: Lawmakers pressed the panel on unallocated tips, whether credit‑card processing fees are ever back‑charged to tipped employees, how service charges interact with the federal tip credit and FICA, and whether written agreements should be required to avoid "coercion" disputes. DOL asked for direction about whether the committee wants to adopt FLSA rules with state guardrails or instead refine existing state statutory language and administrative rules.
Committee action: Members agreed to work with DOL and sponsor offices to draft statutory guardrails, consider carve‑outs (for dealers and other gaming‑industry roles), and return to executive session on May 5 to finalize SB 416.
