Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bylaws Spending Threshold topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Miami CRA advisory board raises executive director construction spending limit to $100,000
Summary
At its May meeting the North Miami CRA advisory board voted 4-0 to amend its bylaws so the CRA executive director may administratively approve construction projects up to $100,000, matching a city carve-out and intended to speed work amid rising construction costs.
At its May meeting, the North Miami Community Redevelopment Agency advisory board voted unanimously to amend its bylaws to raise the executive director’s spending authority for construction projects from $50,000 to $100,000.
The change, staff said, is intended to match a carve-out in the city manager’s purchasing threshold for construction projects and to allow the CRA to move more quickly on smaller capital projects without repeatedly returning to the board for approval.
Staff explained that the existing $50,000 threshold remains for general goods and services, while the $100,000 figure applies only to construction projects the CRA undertakes itself. “We’re asking that threshold be the same as the executive director so that when we have construction projects that are under $100,000, but above my $50,000 threshold, I would also be able to administratively approve those projects,” the executive director said.
Committee members pressed staff on the scope of authority and whether the change would allow the director to approve work without oversight. “That means that you would have the authority to approve it without it going to the advisory board or the CRA?” one committee member asked. Staff clarified the amendment does not apply to grant awards to outside applicants; grant requests still come to the board. The CRA attorney and staff also emphasized that procurement rules and bidding requirements under city policy still apply.
Several members said rising material and construction costs make the higher threshold pragmatic. One member cautioned about the risk of cost overruns and public criticism, citing high-profile examples of projects that ballooned in cost; staff replied that any significant overrun or larger project would still come back to the board and that all actions are reported on consent agendas.
The motion to adopt the bylaws amendment was moved, seconded and passed 4-0. The board’s change takes effect for CRA construction projects only; staff said they will report the implementation and continue to include administrative approvals on consent agendas so the board remains informed.
