Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves hearing officer's recommended order allowing demolition of Lake Copeland house, with replacement subject to Historic Preservation Board review
Summary
After a quasi-judicial appeal and de novo hearing officer review, council adopted a recommended order permitting demolition of an existing, structurally compromised house at 321 East Copeland Drive but denying the proposed replacement as submitted; the owner may demolish after HPB approval of an alternative replacement.
The Orlando City Council adopted a hearing officer's recommended order in a quasi-judicial appeal concerning 321 East Copeland Drive in the Lake Copeland Historic District, allowing the petitioners to demolish the existing, deteriorated structure while requiring Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approval before construction of the replacement house.
Jason Burton, the city's planning official, summarized the application and the HPB's review, noting staff and the HPB had concerns about mass, scale and setbacks for the replacement structure. Burton said the historic preservation board recommended against wholesale demolition of the contributing structure but approved removal of later additions. The petitioners appealed to a hearing officer, who held a de novo review on March 12 and issued a recommended order on April 1 that granted demolition in part and denied in part the proposed replacement as submitted.
Attorney Michelle Hinden, representing homeowners Andre Kressler and Carmen Ziss, told council multiple professional reports found the structure had serious safety issues including compromised structural elements, termite damage, fungal growth and drainage problems and that the building was not reasonably capable of rehabilitation. "The structure is unsafe," Hinden said, and she asked council to adopt the hearing officer's recommended order. The petitioners said they would work with HPB and staff on a replacement plan and accept the condition that HPB approval not be unreasonably withheld.
Commissioner Sheehan moved to adopt the hearing officer's recommended order (approving demolition in part and denying the replacement as submitted). The motion carried by voice vote.
Why it matters: the decision balances competing goals: the city's preservation standards for contributing structures in historic districts and the hearing officer's finding that safety concerns warrant removal of the specific building. The order requires the petitioner to obtain HPB approval for any replacement design before demolition is effectuated.
Next steps: petitioners may pursue HPB review of an alternative replacement structure; city staff will implement the hearing officer's order and advise on demolition permitting conditions.
