Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Meeting roundup: bridge naming, equipment sales and capital approvals approved

Collegedale City Commission · April 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its April 6 meeting the Collegedale City Commission approved a bridge-naming request, declared surplus equipment for auction, funded needed ADA sidewalk repairs and approved the police-range hydroseeding and a new eCitation contract.

The Collegedale City Commission approved several routine and capital items on April 6.

Bridge‑naming request: The commission voted unanimously to support forwarding a request asking the Tennessee General Assembly to name the SR‑317 bridge the Avi/Aubby Camp Memorial Bridge; the resolution recitals described the honoree’s military service and local community involvement. Staff will forward the request to the legislature through the appropriate state representatives.

Surplus equipment: Public works asked to declare a 1994 backhoe surplus and to proceed with auction; the commission approved the request.

Rainbriar sidewalk repair: Staff reported 88 pedestrian hazards in the Rainbriar development, solicited bids and found the lowest responsive bid at $69,442.02 while the ADA budget line held $20,000. The commission approved awarding the contract and funding the $49,442.02 shortfall.

Police-range hydroseeding: The police chief recommended accepting a $16,640.80 bid that included erosion control, acknowledging the project will exceed the $100,000 budgeted amount by roughly $16,000–$19,000; the commission approved funding the overage from fund balance.

New eCitation software: The commission approved moving from the current Tyler Technologies eCitation product to a vendor called New in Blue. The vendor offered to match the city’s current annual fees and amortize a $9,600 implementation fee across the first two years, with year‑one costs around $22,150 before reverting to roughly $18,150 annually.

Roll-call votes and staff follow-ups were recorded in the meeting minutes; staff said implementation details and contract paperwork would be available in posted minutes and procurement files.