Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance committee approves community grants including Juneteenth and Claymont planning
Summary
The New Castle County Administrative Finance Committee approved a set of community grants May 12, moving funds for July 4 events, Juneteenth activities, nonprofit scholarships and redevelopment planning while clarifying submission deadlines for county-program grants.
Get email alerts on the Community Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Administrative Finance Committee of New Castle County voted May 12 to approve a package of community grants drawn from council members’ discretionary funds.
Chair Councilman John Cartier opened the meeting and the committee first approved minutes from prior meetings before moving to the grants matrix. Councilwoman Kilpatrick moved $5,000 from her office to support the Greater Hokusan Area Development Association’s July 4 events in Hokkeston; the motion was seconded and approved.
Cartier then put forward $10,000 from his sponsorship to the Claymont Renaissance Development Corporation to help pay a Philadelphia planning firm for a master plan for redevelopment of the former Claymont steel‑mill site; that motion was seconded and approved.
The committee approved increasing a requested Juneteenth award: council leadership moved to raise Delaware Juneteenth’s grant from $2,500 to $4,500, citing contributions from multiple council offices (the motion to exceed the application amount was made, seconded and carried). The committee also approved $2,000 for Phoenix Family Resources’ Route 9 corridor community campus operations and $2,000 total for the Delaware CBTU chapter’s scholarship and solidarity‑ball support after members offered supplemental contributions from their budgets.
Members approved $4,000 for the C917 Foundation / Monday Club’s annual ball and scholarship program after councilmembers combined staff allocations to reach the final amount.
Where motions required exceeding initially requested amounts, the sponsor made a formal motion to suspend or exceed the application and the committee recorded votes in favor; several members indicated they would not vote on some items (noted in the transcript as “not voting”). Chair Cartier closed the grants portion before moving to other business.
The meeting also included administrative clarifications about grant deadlines: county staff explained that grants routed to county programs requiring an ordinance should be finalized by the last meeting in May (May 26) while grants that do not require county program action may be submitted at the first June meeting.
The committee adjourned after a brief period of member comments.
