Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agriculture topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators warn of agricultural crisis and press for state relief during budget week
Summary
Senators from York, Calhoun and Darlington urged immediate budget attention to an agriculture crisis, warning of widespread crop losses and urging state matching of federal assistance and targeted provisos to help row crop and timber producers.
Get email alerts on the Agriculture topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators on the floor pressed the Senate to treat the agricultural sector as a crisis, citing widespread crop losses and sharply rising production costs.
Senator from York told colleagues that row croppers have experienced more than $700 million in crop losses over two years and called the situation "real" and "ongoing," urging immediate budget consideration of targeted relief measures (SEG 968-981, 996-1004). He said that without intervention many small family farms risk being sold and converted to development.
Senator from Calhoun and other floor members described the combined impact of drought, high diesel and fertilizer prices and depressed commodity prices: they noted production costs for cotton and corn have roughly doubled since the 1990s, while farmgate prices have not kept pace (SEG 1073-1112). Senators discussed proposals to "bridge" farmers to the next year rather than "save everyone," emphasizing immediate, short-term relief and the need for a state match to federal aid.
Questions from other senators asked whether the state would consider matching federal assistance and whether timber losses and nursery sapling mortality should be included in any relief package; senators discussed options including a state match of roughly 50% of federal support targeted to South Carolina producers (SEG 1244-1276).
Senators asked for details on the dollar amount that might be requested and acknowledged uncertainty in exact totals; floor discussion indicated the group planned to present concrete proposals during the budget debate this week and to explore proviso or earmark options that could be drafted into the appropriations measure.
While members emphasized the scale and urgency of the problem, several noted dependencies on the federal relief timeline and the need to balance other budget priorities. The Senate agreed to record remarks for the journal and to pursue further action through the budget process.
