Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Greensburg officials warn lower enrollment, staffing losses have tightened the budget

Greensburg Community Schools Board of Trustees · February 2, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District financial report showed education fund revenues of $1,363,016.81 and expenditures of $1,513,170.48; teacher‑salary percentage stood at 64.8% (below a 65% benchmark) and staff warned of projected ADM‑related revenue shortfalls and operations revenue losses tied to tax changes in coming years.

A district financial report presented at the Greensburg Community Schools board meeting outlined falling enrollment and budgetary pressure that administrators said will affect planning for 2026–27.

A staff member reported month‑to‑date figures: education fund revenues of $1,363,016.81 and education fund expenditures of $1,513,170.48, and said the district's teacher‑salary percentage is at 64.8%, slightly below the 65% figure cited. The presenter attributed the percentage drop in part to departures of higher‑paid teachers and said staff will look at reallocations over the summer to try to restore the percentage above 65%.

The report noted kindergarten enrollment of 68 students — well below historical counts — and a projected ADM shortfall (the presenter said the district was "looking about a 148,000 deficit from last year's ADM losses"). Officials also cited anticipated reductions to operations revenue linked to tax cuts, estimating roughly $250,000 less in 2027 and $310,000 less in 2028, and said two tax‑increment financing (TIF) districts add uncertainty to future revenue projections.

Administrators told the board they plan to monitor enrollment and expenditures closely, use attrition where appropriate to manage personnel costs and return to the board with updated figures and a plan following summer reallocations and the next legislative session.

No formal budget reductions were adopted at the meeting; staff framed the discussion as planning and monitoring in response to anticipated revenue declines.