Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ethics committee waives late-filing fines for Cynthia Ford after she details military service
Summary
The ethics committee granted Cynthia Ford’s appeal of two late-filing penalties after she testified that active-duty military service and hurricane response work contributed to her delays; a motion to waive the fines was made by Representative Guest and recorded by roll call.
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cynthia Ford had two late campaign-filing penalties waived by the ethics committee after she told members that active-duty military service and hurricane-response duties contributed to the delays.
Ford appeared before the committee to appeal a $100 fine for a pre-election report filed about 18 hours late and a substantially larger fine tied to a third-quarter 2024 disclosure she filed on Jan. 15 after an Oct. 15 deadline. The committee’s chair said the $100 fine is “routinely waived” when delays are minimal and noted the committee would consider Ford’s submitted materials and testimony.
Representative Guest moved to waive the $100 fine and to waive the larger fine in light of Ford’s active-duty service, saying, “At this time I would make the motion that we waive the $100 based upon what you stated that she was only 18 hours late. As far as the other one, based upon her active duty, I would ask that we waive that entire fine also and thank her for her service.” The motion was seconded and the chair ordered a roll call; multiple members responded “aye” on the record. The chair later said the committee had granted Ford’s appeal.
Ford told the panel she had been deployed to help after a hurricane and that rotations and duties contributed to the missed filing deadlines; she also stated she had been discharged in November 2025. Counsel administered the oath before Ford’s testimony.
The committee did not specify individual vote attributions in the publicly available transcript; the record shows a roll-call sequence during which members voiced “aye” responses but does not clearly map each vote to a named member. The committee’s action was limited to granting the appeal; no additional penalties or conditions were recorded in the transcript.
The committee then moved on to the next agenda item.
