Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Records Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Charlton commission approves two‑week trial to digitize sewer customer records; rate language inconsistent

Town of Charlton Water/Sewer Commission · May 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Town of Charlton Water/Sewer Commission authorized a two‑week trial to scan sewer customer folders onto the town drive and back them up on memory sticks; commissioners discussed scope (no immediate searchable database) and noted inconsistent rate language in the motion.

The Town of Charlton Water/Sewer Commission on Feb. 4, 2026 authorized a two‑week trial to digitize sewer customer records. Vincent Masterson proposed hiring temporary help to scan full customer folders and save them to a master folder on the town’s sewer drive, with backups on memory sticks. The commission approved a motion to proceed with a two‑week trial and named Masterson to carry out the test as a separate invoiced task.

Masterson described the project as scanning complete folders (not just tie‑in cards) and optionally creating a checklist of common items (e.g., grinder pumps, meter type, whether lot is tied in) that could later be exported to Excel. He said the town already has a scanner and a laptop and that scanned files would be accessible to town staff via the shared drive.

Commissioners discussed future enhancements: Masterson said a GIS‑based system could be proposed later by one of his business partners for a more sophisticated searchable map; the commission did not authorize GIS work at this meeting.

A point of numerical inconsistency arose during the discussion. Masterson and others referenced an estimated daily rate of about $250 for the temporary scanner operator, but the motion as recorded and moved on the floor was worded "at the rate of $2.50 a day for 2 weeks as a trial run." The commission approved the motion as moved; the meeting record contains both figures. The commission asked for the trial to be performed on a separate invoice through Masterson’s consulting arrangement and asked for progress reporting after the trial period.

Next steps: proceed with the two‑week scanning trial, track completion percentage and checklist items, and report results and recommended next steps (including cost and whether to pursue a searchable database or GIS) at the next meeting.