Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Water topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Minnetonka advocates warn Minnetrista council about LIDs and herbicide reliance
Summary
A Lake Minnetonka Advocates representative told the Minnetrista City Council that lake improvement districts (LIDs) can shift liability to residents and default to repeated herbicide treatments; the council said no LID application has been filed in the city and staff will treat the material as background if a petition arrives.
Get email alerts on the Environment Water topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jim Tyson, who said he represents the Lake Minnetonka Advocates, told the Minnetrista City Council on April 6 that lake improvement districts, or LIDs, can lack transparency and may shift liability to residents and municipalities if disbanded. “The petition process lacks transparency and informed consent,” Tyson said, and he urged the council to review DNR guidance and linked research.
Tyson described recent fights over LIDs in nearby communities including Forest Lake, Mound and Harrison’s Bay. He said chemical herbicides are often the default treatment used by organizers and that repeated herbicide applications are costly and “rarely lead to long-term control and native plant recovery,” a summary he attributed to University of Minnesota invasive-species researchers and cited DNR permit guidance for impaired waters.
Mayor Lisa Whan acknowledged receipt of Tyson’s materials and said the city has not received any LID application within its jurisdiction. Whan said that if a petition were filed, the matter would be considered in an open council meeting with opportunity for public comment and council deliberation. “We would take pros and cons, take comments from both sides before any decision would be made,” she said.
Tyson also named a local representative, saying Jane Anderson — recently appointed as the LMC representative — had supported an earlier LID in Harrison’s Bay. The council did not take formal action; Whan asked staff to treat Tyson’s packet as background information in case an application is filed.
The council did not set a deadline or next step beyond the procedural assurance that an application would trigger formal review. Staff and council members noted they cannot discuss the matter outside of a public meeting and urged residents to submit questions during a formal agenda item if a petition is filed.

