Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Isanti council seeks formal engineering input to influence county repaving plans on Whiskey, Heritage
Summary
Council members urged a formal role in county road planning, asking the city engineer to prepare data-backed recommendations and proposing annual coordination with county commissioners to better reflect local traffic-safety concerns.
A council member reopened a months‑long discussion about county roads that pass through Isanti and urged the city to prepare formal, engineering‑backed recommendations to share with the county before repaving work is finalized.
“Local government is the government that knows best what their actual residents want and need,” the council member said, proposing that the city and its engineer compile recommendations for every county road and intersection in Isanti so county planners have the city’s priorities early in project planning.
The discussion centered on two county roads frequently cited by residents—Whiskey and Heritage. Council members and staff reported preliminary speed‑data showing 85th‑percentile speeds substantially above posted limits in some stretches; one speaker said an 85th percentile near 42 mph had been observed in a 30‑mph zone and that a formal speed study could lead the state to raise posted limits unless traffic‑calming measures are proposed.
Speakers debated whether the city should pay for an engineering study to produce data‑driven options the county could not readily dismiss as opinion. Supporters argued that a small, city‑funded study could yield credible, defensible recommendations; critics cautioned that the county retains legal control of those roads and may not adopt the city’s preferred treatments.
Council members suggested inviting county commissioners (Christy Laro and Todd Christensen) to annual coordination meetings, improving public outreach so residents understand which agency handles specific roads, and scheduling the city engineer (Jason) to present findings at a future council meeting. Several members said they would like to include traffic‑calming options and crash/accident data in any formal recommendation.
Council did not approve funding at the meeting. Members asked staff to ask the city engineer to prepare options (and cost estimates for any study) and to place the item on a future agenda for further consideration.
