Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables decision on Three Rivers Park District purchase after safety and process concerns
Summary
Council debated a proposed Three Rivers Park District purchase of a 5-acre private parcel near Dayton River Road and a planned trail segment. Members raised safety concerns about trail alignment at a driveway/curve, questioned process (Park District purchase before presenting a detailed trail design), and asked staff to request an engineered trail plan from Three Rivers; council tabled the request and asked for more information.
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A proposed Three Rivers Park District purchase of a private 5-acre parcel along Dayton River Road prompted more than an hour of council debate on Oct. 20. The parcel sits adjacent to a planned regional trail alignment and residents and council members asked whether a purchase is necessary to build a safe trail at this location.
Several council members said they were uncomfortable with the Park District negotiating purchases before presenting a detailed trail alignment and engineering justification to the city. Safety concerns focused on a driveway that sits on a blind curve along Dayton River Road; members worried adding a trail immediately adjacent to that driveway would create a consistent safety hazard unless the trail alignment or sightlines are changed. The Park District's representatives were not present; council instead voted to table the council action and asked staff to request from Three Rivers a trail design and engineering analysis describing why an easement would be insufficient and why fee-simple acquisition is necessary.
Council members stressed two broad points: they want the Park District to prove that acquisition of this parcel (versus an easement or alternate alignment) is required for a safe trail, and they want to see a comprehensive design and funding plan (including costs and proposed timing) before approving a city-level endorsement of the purchase. The motion to table passed 5-0.

