Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County staff pitches two state exemption models (RP-421F and RP-421P) to spur home improvements and ADUs

Lewis County General Service Committee · April 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff recommended Lewis County consider adopting New York State RP‑421F (phased exemption for residential improvements) and RP‑421P (exemptions for accessory dwelling units) to encourage reinvestment in aging housing stock and expand small-scale housing options; legislators raised administrative and incentive-effectiveness concerns.

County planning staff briefed the committee on two New York State tax-exemption tools that local governments may adopt to encourage residential investment.

Megan Karkowski explained RP‑421F allows counties to phase the tax impact of qualifying owner‑occupied one‑ and two‑family improvements (default program values: minimum project $3,000, maximum eligible value up to $80,000 unless locally capped). The exemption typically covers 100% of the assessed increase in year one and reduces incrementally (commonly by 12.5% per year) over an eight‑year schedule.

RP‑421P is a variant intended to promote accessory dwelling units (ADUs); Karkowski said it commonly exempts the assessment increase for the ADU for five years, then phases the exemption over the next five years, incentivizing creation of compliant smaller rental units without new subdivision infrastructure. She urged that towns and school districts be coordinated with the county adoption.

Legislators questioned administrative burdens on assessors, the size of the taxpayer incentive relative to project cost (a $40,000 improvement yields modest annual tax savings), and whether towns would opt into the county framework. Staff said implementation details (documentation requirements, caps and the exemption schedule) are customizable and that the county could adopt a template to ease town adoption.

The committee did not adopt a local law at the meeting but directed staff to continue outreach and consider timing and administrative workload in any proposed local law.