Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee advances amendment renaming curriculum frameworks as academic standards
Summary
The Education Funding Committee voted to advance SB491 with amendment 1441H, which replaces references to 'curriculum frameworks' with 'academic standards' to reduce regulatory confusion. The Department of Education called the change largely a cleanup; members pressed for staffing and alignment with assessment and instruction.
CONCORD — The House Education Funding Committee on Wednesday advanced a non‑germane amendment to Senate Bill 491 that replaces language referring to "curriculum frameworks" with "academic standards," a change sponsors and the Department of Education said will clarify regulatory text and help districts align curriculum, instruction and assessment.
Representative Rick Lad, sponsor of the amendment 1441H, told the committee the change grew out of discussions at the legislative oversight committee and aims to correct confusion created by the ED306 rule revisions. "There has been confusion... especially after we gone through the ED306 rule changes," Lad said, recounting examples where academic expectations are buried in framework documents and not labeled as standards.
Lad reviewed subject‑by‑subject examples he said show inconsistencies in naming and content — from arts and health education to Holocaust and genocide content in social studies — and argued the change will make standards easier for districts to find and apply.
Nate Green, division director at the New Hampshire Department of Education, told the committee the revision is largely a cleanup: "This is really more of a cleanup bill than any kind of policy change," he said, adding that academic standards are already part of the ED306 minimum standards and that the amendment helps remove inconsistent terminology.
Committee members pressed on implementation issues, including whether the change reduces state oversight and how academic standards will be updated and supported. Several members urged that the department be adequately staffed to carry out periodic reviews; Lad and Green said academic standards are subject to periodic review under ED306 and that past updates involved practitioners and teachers drawn from the field.
The committee also adopted a separate amendment (1454H) to SB491 that would separately account for tuition and transportation funding related to career‑technical education, which sponsors said protects tuition dollars from being depleted when transportation reimbursements rise.
After debate, the committee voted to recommend SB491 ought to pass with amendments (OTPA). The committee placed the bill on the consent calendar.
