Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wichita staff review sidewalk rules, costs and maintenance responsibilities as council weighs upgrades
Summary
City engineering staff reviewed the 1979 sidewalk ordinance, ADA and national guidance on sidewalk widths, cost comparisons between standalone and CIP‑built sidewalks, and exceptions for design constraints; council members raised concerns about special assessments, city trees and equity for low‑income homeowners.
Paul Gonzelman (Public Works & Utilities) presented the city’s sidewalk construction and maintenance policy, noting the 1979 ordinance language and current guidance from AASHTO, NACTO and ADA. He told council that minimum clear widths and passing zones are required by national guidance and that multi‑use paths are commonly 10 feet wide in higher‑use corridors.
Gonzelman compared construction unit prices and showed that sidewalks built as part of CIP projects generally cost less per square foot than stand‑alone arterial sidewalk builds, citing examples where 10‑ft multi‑use paths bid at about $5 per square foot on some CIP projects versus roughly $7–8 per square foot on stand‑alone projects with additional mobilization and tree‑work costs. He also described ordinance exceptions where design constraints (floodways, freeways, existing drainage boxes) make sidewalks impractical.
Council members expressed concerns about who pays for repairs (the ordinance typically assesses adjacent property owners), the burden of city trees whose roots damage sidewalks, and how to help low‑income or elderly homeowners. City staff and the city manager noted current programs: the city maintains intersection ramps and funds limited maintenance (roughly $1 million per year), and there is a hardship deferral option for special assessments.
Next steps: staff will provide more detailed breakdowns of sidewalk mileage (city‑maintained vs privately maintained), continue coordination on subdivision and pedestrian plans, and return with project‑level cost and connectivity recommendations for the May workshop.
