Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collaboration Time topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wednesday collaboration draws debate: options include early releases, sprinkled days or condensed PD
Summary
Teachers and administrators debated the structure and equity of Wednesday collaboration (Article 33), raising concerns that weekly after-school Wednesdays are burdensome and inconsistently implemented; parties agreed to compile calendar data and brainstorm alternatives (early release, late starts, sprinkled days) with cost estimates.
Negotiators engaged in an extended exchange about how to preserve meaningful teacher collaboration without imposing inequitable burdens. Teachers described the current Wednesday model as uneven across buildings: high schools often rely on Wednesdays because they lack overlapping plan times, while elementary and middle schools use a mix of plan time and PLCs during the day.
Participants identified three central problems: inconsistent implementation across buildings (buy-in), frequency (weekly Wednesdays may be overused), and student-contact implications (early-release or full-day PD options reduce instructional minutes). Proposed alternatives included sprinkling collaboration days into the calendar (e.g., a few strategically scheduled early releases or half days per year), returning to quarterly early releases or late starts, or creating targeted districtwide grade-level alignment days.
District finance staff warned of cost and logistical constraints (child care, buses, limits on mills and the LOB cap) and committed to preparing per-day cost breakdowns and a draft calendar mapping existing PD/PLC days so negotiators can weigh options. Parties agreed to create a shared brainstorming spreadsheet and to meet again on Monday the 4th to review proposed calendar options and rough costings.
