Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neenah council approves municipal court fee increase and routine contract payments
Summary
The council approved ordinance 2026-04 and resolution 2026-02 to raise municipal court fees by $10 following state law, and approved several pay requests and contracts including a $118,960.83 final pay request to Venton Construction for a parks/shoreline project.
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Neenah City Council approved changes to municipal court fees and signed off on a string of routine contract payments and final pay requests during its organizational meeting.
By unanimous or clearly recorded votes, the council approved ordinance 2026-04 (amending municipal court procedure) and resolution 2026-02, which raises the municipal court fee by $10 (from $38 to $48) to align with requirements in 2025 Wisconsin Act 113. Alderman Ericson presented the finance committee recommendations and led the motions.
On capital projects, the council approved pay request No. 3 (final) to Venton Construction of Two Rivers for $118,960.83 for work completed through Dec. 31, 2025 on a parks/shoreline project. Director Kading told the council that total project costs, including change orders, came to about $1,510,571 and that the city had budgeted $3 million in the CIP; grant support included a $1 million Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources award and a $100,000 NRDA grant. The council approved the Venton pay request.
The council also approved a final payment of $40,427 to Omniglass and Paint for a window and exterior door replacement at city hall and awarded contracts for pavement and sidewalk repairs and hot-mix asphalt (HMA) pavement repair (the transcript records an HMA award amount that appears as $189,910.62 but the spoken formatting is unclear). Council members asked for clearer bid-to-final accounting on future public works memos.
Councilors emphasized that change orders and scope additions (including a northeast shoreline section added during construction) explained differences between initial bids and final totals.

