Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ceres council hears FY2026–27 budget showing $2.4 million gap as pension and fire costs rise
Summary
The Ceres City Council reviewed a draft FY2026–27 budget that projects a $2.4 million shortfall after manager adjustments, driven primarily by rising pension obligations and a higher fire contract; staff proposed one‑time and ongoing reductions and warned reserves could fall below target.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finance Director Vanessa Portillo told the Ceres City Council on April 27 that the city’s draft fiscal‑year 2026–27 budget faces a substantial structural gap.
"At this status quo level, the city is facing a projected deficit of about $5.6 million," Vanessa Portillo said, and after the city manager’s recommended adjustments the deficit falls to about $2.4 million. Portillo presented citywide revenue and expenditure totals — roughly $86.7 million in revenues and $84.9 million in expenditures — and explained the shortfall falls most heavily on the general fund.
Portillo and staff pointed to three primary drivers: a roughly $1.4 million increase in pension costs for FY27, a near‑term 19% increase in the city’s contracted fire services cost, and flat or uncertain major revenues such as property and sales tax. The presentation showed the general fund’s reserves could fall to about $2.0 million (approximately 6.6% of expenditures), well under the city’s 18% reserve target.
City Manager Steve Williams described the balancing steps included in the recommended budget: about $3.22 million in cost‑saving measures grouped into one‑time solutions, ongoing reductions and technical adjustments. Those actions reduce the status‑quo gap but leave a remaining structural deficit.
Public commenters and council members pressed staff on options to reduce recurring costs. Community members questioned outsourcing choices, the city’s use of temporary contracts versus filling frozen positions, landscaping contract spending and business license compliance. Police and fire costs were repeatedly raised; staff said fire contract negotiations continue and that final numbers will be returned to council before budget adoption.
Portillo outlined next steps: staff will refine department budgets, pursue additional cost‑saving options, and return to council with updated proposals in May and a budget adoption hearing planned for June. The council did not vote on final adoption at the meeting.
Ending: The city manager and finance director will return with recommended adjustments and further detail on contract negotiations and staffing tradeoffs ahead of the June adoption process.

