Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board delays vote on county master fee schedule after supervisors call for simplification and deeper review

Lake County Board of Supervisors · April 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Deputy CAO presented proposed updates to the county master fee schedule (CPI 2.48% plus department adjustments). Several supervisors asked for a consultant-led deep dive and simplification—especially for Community Development fees—and continued the public hearing to May 5 for further study.

The Lake County Board of Supervisors on April 28 opened a public hearing on proposed updates to the county master fee schedule and then continued the hearing after supervisors sought more data and a departmental review.

Deputy CAO Casey Moreno told the board the fee updates respond to CPI (2.48%), cost studies and state and federal mandates and include changes across departments (Agriculture, Animal Control, Assessor-Recorder, Behavioral Health, Building and Safety, Code, Planning, Public Works and Water Resources).

Multiple supervisors and members of the public argued the county’s fee list is overly complex and difficult for residents and businesses to use. Supervisor Sabatier described the master fee document as "one of the most overwhelming things to ever lay eyes on" and questioned percentage-based charges tied to construction cost while recommending an hourly-rate approach for permit-review staff to make costs more transparent to applicants.

Supervisor Owen and others raised concerns about large, state-mandated increases in behavioral health fees and asked for documentation justifying steep per-day or per-visit changes. Board members agreed they would not take final action at the April 28 meeting because the resolution had not been uploaded and because they wanted a consultant review for CDD fee structures.

Action taken: The board continued the public hearing to May 5 at 10:45 a.m. and requested staff pursue a consultant-assisted 'deep dive' into development-related fees to explore simplification options and potential alternatives to percentage-based charges.

What’s next: Staff will return with comparative data, fee-study options and consultant recommendations before the board takes a final vote.