Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Analysis: Paris Historic Theater restoration would need sustained city subsidy; concessions drive revenue

City of Paris City Council · April 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An operational and funding analysis found the Paris Historic Theater could draw about 145 event days and 38,000 annual attendees but would likely cost the city roughly $100,000–$300,000 annually depending on renovation scenario; staff will return with partnership and funding options.

City consultants on April 28 told the City of Paris council that restoring the Paris Historic Theater could draw substantial community use but is unlikely to be fully self-sustaining and will require a recurring city subsidy or external funding.

Brian Wickersam of Ox Architecture, presenting a report compiled with Victus Advisers, said the study projected about "145 days of usage on the theater" and roughly "38,000 residents that would be using the theater within the year," with an average capacity near 300 seats. He said concessions are expected to be the largest revenue source.

"From an operating revenue standpoint, the number one revenue source for a theater like this is going to be the concessions," Wickersam said, noting projections of $300,000 to $500,000 in concessions over the first five years under modeled scenarios.

Consultants modeled multiple schemes. Smaller renovation options (roughly $7–$14 million) and mid-level approaches produce similar revenue because they retain roughly the same seat count; larger ground-up options increase capital cost without proportionately larger revenue. Wickersam summarized projected net fiscal outcomes: early-year city subsidies near $200,000 on average, dropping to approximately $100,000 by year three in some scenarios; a $25 million scheme produced higher long-term city net cost than smaller renovation options.

Council members asked about operating structure, program flexibility (recommendations included retractable seating to allow mixed uses), and examples from similarly sized cities. Wickersam and Victus advisers said promoters expect regional demand because Paris is centrally located and advised maximizing flexibility and concessions to improve operations.

Council received the report and asked staff to return with detailed partnership, funding and capital options, including grant and philanthropy strategies and potential naming or sponsorship opportunities.