Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
West Miami defers decision on $55,000 mitigation for property with about $1.03 million in code liens
Summary
Commissioners debated a mitigation/stipulation offer of $55,000 for a property carrying roughly $1.03 million in code enforcement liens; concerns included the fairness to a new buyer who would inherit the lien and the size of the reduction. The commission voted to defer further action for additional negotiation and information.
The West Miami City Commission on April 29 deferred action after a heated discussion over a staff-negotiated mitigation (stipulation) offer of $55,000 to resolve code enforcement liens on a house at 6437 Southwest 16th Street that staff said currently carries more than $1 million in outstanding violations.
City staff described the offer as part of a stipulation with a prospective buyer who, according to staff, intends to rehabilitate the property and was willing to accept a settlement that would allow closing. "They have six months to get it approved," the city manager said, explaining the stipulation would be honored only if the buyer completed required approvals within that window. "If not, the fine reverts back and we've accepted their offer of $55,000," the manager said.
Several commissioners pushed back on the dollar amount and the legal dynamics. "I don't agree with the amount. I think it's too low considering the house was purchased at 375," Commissioner Sios said, referring to the buyer’s purchase price and arguing the mitigation was a large reduction from the approximately $1.03 million lien figure staff cited. Other commissioners raised concerns that a company or investor that bought the property pre-foreclosure may profit while a subsequent family buyer would absorb the remaining liability if the work was not completed.
The city attorney explained that liens are rem liens against property and that the outstanding fine is tied to the parcel; a later owner does not carry personal liability for prior owner conduct, but the lien remains attached to the property. The attorney described the staff offer as a stipulation agreement that would credit the settled amount if the buyer completed the work within the six-month period and would reinstate the full lien if the condition was not met.
Given the legal and equity concerns and questions about the buyer’s ability to meet the six-month milestone, the commission voted to defer the matter to allow staff to renegotiate and for the buyer to appear or provide additional information. A motion to defer carried on a voice vote.
The commission did not adopt a final mitigation amount on April 29; staff will return with follow-up negotiations and additional details on the buyer’s plan and timetable.
