Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Safety Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Candidates back clear policies on hate speech, special‑education protections and inclusive schools

Shoreham‑Wading River School District Board of Education — Meet the Candidate Night · April 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the candidate forum, contenders broadly supported clear district policies on hate speech and nondiscrimination, emphasized the DASA reporting process and training, and discussed gender‑neutral facilities and student safety.

Candidates at the Shoreham‑Wading River Meet the Candidates night broadly agreed the board must maintain clear policies and oversight to address hate speech, discrimination and student safety.

Henry Perez urged a "zero tolerance" approach and said the board should enforce existing policy and character education programs. "We should continue to enforce that," he said of anti‑discrimination policy.

Erin Saunders Morano and other candidates called for comprehensive, consistently applied policies and accountability. "We need to come up with comprehensive policy. We need to follow that to a T," Morano said, adding that every child should feel safe.

Incumbent Katie Anderson described the district’s DASA reporting process and state requirements for workplace violence reporting and staff training: "If we happen to come across ... they should be encouraged immediately to fill out a DASA form... all staff is supposed to know how to report these issues and where to find the forms in the district." Several candidates also said gender‑neutral restrooms are already available and urged following state guidance and engaging the community on any changes.

Candidates presented positions intended for policy oversight; no board policy changes were proposed or adopted at the forum. Attendees were left with candidate positions that would guide their potential votes if elected.