Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Taxes Abatements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town of Needham Board of Assessors reports 65 abatements granted, 93 denied and names several property decisions
Summary
After an executive session May 1, the Town of Needham Board of Assessors announced outcomes for exemption and abatement applications—reporting 65 grants and 93 denials out of 161 cases—and scheduled a follow-up meeting for May 29 at 9:30 a.m.
Get email alerts on the Property Taxes Abatements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Town of Needham Board of Assessors on May 1 returned from an executive session to announce decisions on a batch of exemption and abatement applications and to set its next meeting for May 29 at 9:30 a.m.
A board member providing an abatement update said there were 161 total cases as of May 1, of which 65 had been granted and 93 denied; the speaker added a small number of matters would be revisited. "Total we had 65 granted. And as of today, there is 93 denied," the board member said.
The board moved into executive session citing exemptions for real estate and personal property applications, returns for property held for charitable purposes that are not open to public inspection, and the need to discuss litigation strategy where an open meeting might harm the government's position. A motion to enter executive session was made and seconded on the record; the transcript does not name the mover or seconder or record a roll-call tally.
After returning to open session, staff member Julie read the decisions reached in executive session. Julie listed multiple property outcomes, including denials for 72A Street, 105 Cabbage Street, 460 Hillside A, 50 Cabbage Street and 166 Crescent Road; she also reported a revised denial for 23 Highland Terrace and a revised grant for 16 Highland Terrace. "72A Street, deny. 105 Cabbage Street, deny. 460 Hillside A denied," Julie said as she read the results.
Board members discussed administrative follow-ups. They asked staff to provide a breakdown of results by commercial and residential classifications at the next meeting and to circulate updated links to spreadsheets and Appellate Tax Board (ATB) case materials in advance of future sessions. A late tax-assistance application that had been slipped under the door after the April 1 deadline was noted at the meeting; the applicant identified herself as Shirley during the discussion.
The board agreed to meet next on May 29 at 9:30 a.m. and adjourned after a brief closing.
What happened next: the board scheduled follow-up materials and asked staff to prepare more detailed case breakdowns for the May 29 meeting. The transcript does not record vote tallies for the motion to enter executive session or who formally moved and seconded that motion.

