Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public Safety committee forwards juvenile court contract amendment adding $1.155 million to full council
Summary
The Cuyahoga County Public Safety and Justice Affairs Committee voted to forward Resolution 20260064, a juvenile court request to extend its master contract for residential treatment services and add up to $1,155,000, to the full council under suspension after brief questions about procurement timing.
The Cuyahoga County Public Safety and Justice Affairs Committee on Monday voted to send Resolution 20260064 — a juvenile court request to amend its master contract for residential treatment services and add up to $1,155,000 — to the full County Council under second‑reading suspension.
Jennifer Howard, speaking on behalf of the juvenile court, told the committee that the court currently contracts with seven providers for traditional residential services and is asking to extend the contract through the end of the year and increase funding by $1.155 million. "We currently have seven providers for this service and we're asking to extend it to the end of the year for an additional $1.155 million," Howard said.
Committee members focused questions on procurement timing and contract length. In response, Howard said the office expects to issue a request for proposals within "the next week or two" to recruit additional providers and noted that contracts are generally two years. She said the court hopes to return to the committee before year‑end with new services to begin Jan. 1.
After the presentation and brief questioning, a member moved to forward the resolution to the full council under second‑reading suspension. The motion received a second and passed on a voice vote; the meeting record does not include a roll‑call tally.
The item was listed in the meeting materials as Resolution 20260064 and described as an amendment to a master contract with various providers for residential treatment services, extending the contract period and adding funds "in a total amount not to exceed 1,155,000." The committee record contains inconsistent date language in the resolution text (transcript references such as "112024 through 12312025" and "to 1231 2022"); the committee discussion did not resolve those date inconsistencies and the exact effective date is not clearly recorded in the spoken record.
There were no public comments on the item. With no other business, the committee adjourned.
What happens next: the resolution will appear on the County Council agenda for final consideration under second‑reading suspension; the full council will vote and publish any final vote tally and effective dates.
