Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board splits on Dorado rezoning: approves 1‑acre northwest section, denies denser southeast plan
Summary
After hours of testimony from hundreds of residents concerned about water, wastewater, traffic and community character, the Mohave County Board approved a scaled rezoning for the Dorado/Angle Homes proposal: the northwest block will be rezoned to 1‑acre single‑family lots; the higher‑density southeastern portion was denied and removed from consideration.
The Mohave County Board of Supervisors on May 4 split its decision on a major rezoning request from Angle Homes (the Dorado proposal), approving a narrower plan and denying the denser components.
Planning staff described the request as a set of rezonings to align zoning with a recently adopted general plan: suburban residential, low‑density residential and commercial pockets. The full proposal covered roughly 1,200 acres and was presented as matching the prior general‑plan land use designations. Planning Manager Scott explained the options, including an approach to move forward only with the northwest section comprised of roughly 1‑acre parcels.
The public comment period drew long lines. Dozens of Golden Valley residents, civic groups and local officials urged denial citing water resources, wastewater feasibility, emergency services, road capacity, park/open‑space shortfalls and preservation of a rural lifestyle. "This proposal would introduce approximately 6,000 new residents… The main concern here… is that it does not clearly demonstrate rough proportionality between the impacts of 2,400 homes and the public benefits provided," said Danielle Oleek, representing residents within 900 feet of the proposal.
Speakers raised specific technical concerns: whether the Golden Valley Irrigation District allocations are sufficient, the lack of a fully defined centralized wastewater plan, and the location and cost of any future wastewater facility. Jonathan Wright, representing a large opposition coalition, warned the board of potential legal challenges and ADEQ review if density were approved without infrastructure assurances.
Applicant Tyler Angel said he had negotiated concessions and would accept rezoning the northwest block to 1‑acre single‑family parcels and removing the southern, sewer‑intensive component from consideration. "If that's the will of the board… we would support that vote," Angel told supervisors.
Supervisor Martin moved a two‑part plan: adopt Resolution 2026‑079 for Section 26 (the northwest one‑acre parcels) and deny the southeast portions (Sections 25 and 36). The board approved the NW adoption by a 4–1 roll call vote and then approved a motion to deny the southern portions. The effect: the 1‑acre northwest portion advances; the denser southeast proposal is removed and would need to restart the application process if refiled.
What this means: Golden Valley residents who had sought a 1‑acre minimum in the northwest received the outcome they requested; opponents of the larger development will have the denser portion pushed off the table for now. Staff and the applicant said the SE portion could be brought back later subject to reapplication and statutory notice requirements.
Next procedural step: county staff will update zoning records and proceed with the approvals and conditions specific to Section 26. The denied southern portion may be refiled at a later date by the applicant if they choose.
