Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Temporary Uses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
TAC debates 'night watchman' provisions and temporary‑use rules for manufactured homes and RVs
Summary
TAC members questioned code language that allows a manufactured dwelling as a permanent residence for employees or security 'night watchman's quarters,' debated 120‑day vs permanent foundation rules, and discussed whether temporary‑use rules and RV park definitions match state law and practical construction needs.
TAC members spent an extended portion of the meeting examining the city’s treatment of manufactured dwellings, RVs and ‘‘night watchman’’ housing in mixed‑use employment and industrial areas. The code language under discussion permits a manufactured home to be used as a permanent residence for employees or property owners when presence is required for security; it also includes a separate, specific provision called ‘‘night watchman quarters’’ that currently references manufactured dwellings.
Members raised multiple practical and policy concerns. Several asked why a manufactured dwelling used longer than 120 days must be placed on a permanent foundation; staff said the requirement likely ties to building‑safety and stormwater regulations and acknowledged they would invite building‑department and engineering input to clarify the rationale. TAC members also contrasted a single dwelling on an industrial site (which could in practice be an RV or tiny house) with RV park rules, which the packet limits to community commercial districts; staff said state law distinguishes RV parks (longer‑term residential intent) from campgrounds (recreational use) and the code was drafted to comply.
Members suggested clarifying whether a ‘‘night guardian’’ unit could be an attached/detached standard dwelling, a manufactured home, or an RV; staff said mixed‑use employment permitted‑use tables allow a single unit dwelling as a secondary use or a manufactured‑home option as a night watchman quarter, and agreed to align language across sections so that the permitted uses table and the night‑watchman paragraph use the same definitions. TAC also recommended moving cross‑references to the consolidated temporary‑uses section so that short‑term camp‑host style occupancy is documented with a simple check‑box permit path rather than creating ad‑hoc site conditions.
No formal decisions were made; staff committed to revise and clarify the temporary‑use language, explain foundation and storm‑water rationale with building and engineering staff, and ensure consistent definitions between the permitted‑use table and the night‑watchman paragraph. Staff said the issue may be revisited in a future round of amendments if substantive policy change is required.
