Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Earmarks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council-dedicated funds: health pilots, CPED projects and debate over using existing resources

Minneapolis City Budget Committee · May 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee reviewed 13 council-dedicated funds for 2026, including Health Department pilots for opioid response and autism/water safety, CPED's tiny-homes and childcare-worker items, and public-works earmarks; council members asked for clearer reporting and questioned whether using existing departmental resources to satisfy earmarks requires a formal council vote.

Deputy City Operations Officer Brett Jelly opened the committee's review of 2026 council-dedicated funds, the new reporting stream that requires departments to update Council in April and August each year. Health Department representatives reported two items: a $150,000 expansion of a South Minneapolis opioid-response pilot to purchase medication used for opioid-use disorder for federally qualified health centers, and a $25,000 autism-and-water-safety public-health initiative currently proceeding as a contract amendment.

CPED Director Eric Hanson described five council-dedicated items his department is implementing, including $50,000 for public-housing tenant organizing, a $15,000 Tiny Homes Big Dreams scoping effort, emergency shelter operations contracting with Hennepin County (contract expected in May'June), a $125,000 commercial adaptive-reuse study and a childcare-worker initiative to be delivered using existing CPED staff and contracts rather than creating and funding a new FTE.

Several council members pressed staff on implementation and process. Council Member Wonsley said she understood the childcare earmark as creating a funded FTE and asked whether using existing resources to meet the earmark's intent required a formal council action; CPED staff and Deputy COO told members they would follow up and that the annual reporting requirement will show whether earmarks are being used as intended or whether additional council action is needed.

Public Works reported progress on earmarked items including a zero-waste project manager (re-scoped to a broader climate-legacy-funded role and expected to post soon) and sidewalk-plowing pilots that had spent roughly $250,000 to date. Council members asked for follow-ups and documentation that would detail how specific earmarks are being implemented and whether the funding use matches the amendments approved in the budget.

The committee directed staff to continue reporting and to provide the requested clarifications to authors of the respective amendments.