Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 325 Celita Del Soul topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board continues Celita del Soul pre‑application; flags FAR supplemental materials and asks for coordinated windows, materials and landscape

Single Family Design Board · May 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a pre‑application consultation for 325 Celita del Soul (reported FAR ~89%), the board continued the item and recommended the applicant return with coordinated plans, refined window placements to address privacy, reevaluated plate heights and header relationships, and a landscaping plan to mitigate potential neighbor impacts.

The Single Family Design Board continued a pre‑application consultation for a proposed second‑story addition at 325 Celita del Soul on May 4, 2026 after applicants presented floor plan and elevation concepts and discussed an FAR exceeding the board’s 85% guideline (applicant cited about 89%).

Designer Shava Riley and owner Randy Chapman described a plan to add a second story (approximate peak elevation reported at 21.9 feet) with a front deck and modest modernized materials (stucco and Hardy siding options cited). Staff clarified the request was for a waiver of supplemental submittal requirements tied to FAR percentage, not a waiver of zoning requirements themselves, and noted that private view impacts are not within SFDB purview, while public view protection is.

A nearby resident, represented by Ken Boxer, raised privacy concerns about a second‑floor window that faces a neighbor’s backyard. The board asked the applicant to consider moving or modifying that window, to provide a site plan showing distances to neighboring property lines, and to return with refined drawings that coordinate plans and elevations. Board members also recommended re‑examining a proposed 9‑foot plate on the second floor relative to header heights and proportion, to wrap materials consistently at corners and to prepare a landscape plan that could buffer views to the west.