Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 1511 Alamita Padre Sarah topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board continues Alamita Padre Sarah garage/driveway project, asks for railing and landscape coordination

Single Family Design Board · May 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Design review of an as‑built driveway extension and proposed 800 sq ft garage at 1511 Alamita Padre Sarah was continued May 4, 2026 for additional study of railing interfaces, landscape buffering and grading details; the board voted that a 3‑D grading model was not required at this stage.

The Single Family Design Board continued consideration of a permit request to legalize an as‑built driveway extension and to permit an 800‑square‑foot garage/workshop at 1511 Alamita Padre Sarah on May 4, 2026.

Architect Jim Davis and property owner Dave Dwelly presented the site and design: a regraded driveway, new retaining walls, reworked paving, a pocketing garage door system and a green roof over the workshop. The applicant said parts of the paving and grading were completed without permits and explained the intent to regrade to a more functional driveway and to repave where needed.

Board members raised questions about existing and proposed site walls (roughly 8–11 feet at some points), whether portions of the driveway would remain permeable or convert to concrete, the adequacy of condenser clearance under an entry cavity and the need for compliant pool fencing and gates. Staff and the applicant discussed grading quantities; the applicant indicated cut and fill figures were substantial and clarified that civil quantities included fill underneath the structure. The board also asked the applicant to refine how the railing terminates near the stair and to consider how the railing integrates with plaster walls and the pool edge.

The board moved to continue the item indefinitely to the full board with comments requesting a coordinated landscape plan, further study of the railing and returns for safety, and clarification of the driveway paving and grading; the motion passed unanimously. During discussion the board found that a 3‑D grading model would not be necessary for the next review step.