Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Scranton SD advances revised nepotism policy on first reading after failed motion to table

Scranton SD Board · April 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Scranton SD board conducted a first reading of Policy 304.1 (nepotism) on April 29, 2026; a motion to table for further committee review failed, and the first read passed 6–2. Directors debated whether the rewrite strengthened or softened prior prohibitions and noted one past hiring in 2021.

At a special meeting on April 29, 2026, the Scranton SD board held the first reading of Policy 304.1, a rewrite addressing nepotism in hiring and board involvement. Director Fox introduced the item and asked for the motion to approve first reading.

A board member moved to table the item so it could be discussed in policy committee; that motion failed on a roll call vote (three in favor, five opposed). Director Fox, speaking as policy chair, said she had questions about how the changes were developed and how they interact with administrative regulations but added, “I’m not opposed to updating policies,” and asked for the matter to be discussed further in committee before the final vote.

Board discussion centered on differences between the 2014 policy — which members said prohibited nepotism — and the proposed rewrite. Meeting participants were told the proposed policy would require central administration and the superintendent to notify the board promptly if a relative applied for a job and would bar a board member from participating in interview panels for positions where a relative is an applicant. In response to a direct question, someone in the meeting stated that on July 26, 2021 a hiring occurred that would have been prohibited under the previous policy.

On roll call, the motion for first reading of Policy 304.1 passed 6–2. Board members were reminded that the second read is scheduled in three business days and that further review in policy committee can be requested.