Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Plan Commission approves 828 Cherry Street rooming house CUP with conditions after neighborhood objections

Green Bay Plan Commission · April 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff recommended a conditional-use permit limited to 20 beds for a proposed sober-only rooming house at 828 Cherry Street; neighbors raised concerns about concentration of congregate living and public-notice materials. The commission approved the CUP and will forward it to City Council with at least one recorded dissent.

City planning staff recommended approval of a conditional-use permit on April 27 for a proposed rooming house at 828 Cherry Street, limiting sleeping capacity to 20 and attaching buffering and parking conditions described in the staff report.

Staff review: Planning staff explained the municipal code definitions and standards for rooming houses and dormitory-like uses (referencing section 44-1581 and 44-1584 in the staff discussion). The applicant originally proposed capacity for 25–31 people; staff constrained the recommendation to a 20-person maximum based on building area, sleeping-area and bathroom ratios, and an initial parking analysis that uses a one-space-per-bed standard pending final site-plan review.

Key conditions recommended by staff, and accepted in the motion to approve, included: a 20-person bed limit; one parking space per bed to be demonstrated in a final site plan (staff estimated a maximum feasible onsite stall count around 18 but said final determination requires full site design); a six-foot, 100%-opaque fence and a five-foot landscape buffer along the southern and western property lines; and a 15-foot buffer where parking abuts a sidewalk. Staff also emphasized that any programmatic change (for example, adding on-site recovery services or staffing that would change the use beyond a rooming house) would require a new CUP amendment.

Neighborhood concerns: Several nearby residents and neighborhood leaders spoke in opposition or with concern. Kevin Plotty asked for a physical buffer because the proposed parking lot directly abuts his backyard. Neighborhood association president Garrett Bader said the neighborhood has seen multiple congregate-living uses in a concentrated area and urged commissioners to consider whether this site is the right location. Justin Scott and other residents said they have invested in neighborhood revitalization and worried a new congregate-living site could impede that work.

Commission discussion and vote: Commissioners asked staff whether the proposed use differs from other congregate-living types (e.g., shelters, CLAs) and whether existing nuisance or police-call data show problems in the area. Staff said available data did not show a pattern that would, on its own, defeat the CUP and reiterated that the use as proposed is residential (rooming house) and does not include on-site treatment services. A motion to approve staff’s recommended conditions passed by voice vote; the transcript records at least one member voting "nay." The item will move to Common Council for final action on May 5.

What’s next: If the Common Council approves the CUP with the same conditions, the permit will allow a 20-bed rooming house at 828 Cherry Street subject to the buffering, parking and site-plan requirements described by staff. Any increase in beds or addition of programming beyond rooming-house services will require an amended CUP.