Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the HB1064 Liability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senator Alul urges passage of liability bill, opposes interim study after Grossman accident

Finance - Division I · April 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senator Alul opposed sending House Bill 1064 to an interim study, citing testimony and the severe injuries of Oscar Grossman in a CTE program; proponents and opponents debated incremental caps and fairness across populations, and the committee proceeded to a voice vote on the motion.

Senator Alul told the Finance - Division I panel she could not support sending House Bill 1064 to an interim study, saying committee hearings and written testimony already supply sufficient justification for action.

"We have a family in New Hampshire who is going to be dealing with this tragedy for the rest of their lives," Senator Alul said, describing the injuries sustained by Oscar Grossman after a ladder fall while participating in a CTE program. She argued families like Grossman's lack equal access to damages compared with other populations and that modest statutory changes create incentives for improved safety.

Senator Ganon responded that proposed increases in caps would not fully cover catastrophic losses and would address only a fraction of a seriously injured person's long-term costs; he nonetheless acknowledged incremental changes were the legislature’s typical approach. The committee debated whether the bill's changes would meaningfully help catastrophic cases but proceeded to a voice vote on an interim-study motion.

The transcript records the interim-study motion was moved, seconded and put to a voice vote. The record here follows the committee transcript’s voice-vote reporting; a roll-call tally was not provided in the record. The committee then continued with the docket.