Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montgomery County Legislature approves package of routine resolutions, budget amendments and intermunicipal agreements
Summary
At its regular meeting the Montgomery County Legislature approved a slate of resolutions (111–128), covering personnel reorganizations, budget amendments, a New York State justice assistance grant, an intermunicipal sludge-treatment agreement, a community health MOU with the City of Amsterdam and acceptance of an opioid-settlement agreement.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Montgomery County Legislature approved a package of resolutions and budget amendments at its meeting, voting to pass Resolutions 111 through 128 on voice votes with no recorded discussion on the measures.
Key items included reestablishing several job titles and abolishing others (Resolutions 111, 112, 113); authorizing child-care facilities agreements for 2026–2027 (Resolution 114); approving a memorandum of understanding between the Montgomery County Health Department and the City of Amsterdam for community health programming (Resolution 115); two separate amendments to the 2026 operating budget for mental-health programs (Resolutions 116 and 117); acceptance of a New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (Resolution 118); an intermunicipal agreement for sludge treatment and disposal with the Village of Canjah Wastewater Treatment Plant and Montgomery County Sanitary District No. 1 (Resolution 119); and authorizations for roadside grass-and-brush control agreements (Resolution 120) and other routine budget and procurement items (Resolutions 121–124, 127, 128).
The Legislature also authorized adoption of Introductory Local Law C (Local Law 3 of 2026), requiring source separation of recyclables (Resolution 125); and approved Resolution 126 authorizing a settlement agreement with multiple entities in ongoing opioid litigation.
Most measures were sponsored by pairs of legislators as noted in the record (for example, Pollock and Majuski for the recycling law), and each was recorded as passed on a voice vote; the transcript does not provide numeric tallies or any recorded opposing statements.
The meeting opened with a public hearing on the proposed recycling law at which no public comments were made; the hearing was then adjourned before the regular meeting business proceeded.
The session concluded with a motion to adjourn at approximately 6:19 p.m.

